What they said about ‘Gable And Lombard’ (not Clark and Carole)   Leave a comment

Posted by vp19 on 2013.09.16 at 01:35
Current mood: aggravatedaggravated

carole lombard clark gable 061338 horse show larger

I don’t know if there’s some “psychic frequency” that connects mere mortals such as ourselves to the hereafter — especially the section populated by the classic Hollywood colony — but just to protect myself, I wish to announce this entry is about “Gable And Lombard,” the alleged 1976 biopic of Clark and Carole. (I don’t want to walk out the door one morning to find myself dodging lightning bolts from Carole Lombard…though after operating this site for 6 1/4 years, I’m sure I’m on good terms with her. At least I hope so.)

gable and lombard 05a

We’ve written about “Gable And Lombard” several times before (http://carole-and-co.livejournal.com/47604.htmlhttp://carole-and-co.livejournal.com/242909.html and some comments from screenwriter Barry Sandler at http://carole-and-co.livejournal.com/321033.html). Today, we’ll examine two contemporary reviews of the James Brolin-Jill Clayburgh film, plus an article detailing reaction to its historical inaccuracies.

The movie premiered in February, and on March 5, 1976, the St. Petersburg (Fla.) Evening Independent published its review. It wasn’t good.

gable and lombard 030576 st. petersburg evening independent 01

“Gable And Lombard” arrived in Syracuse that spring, and the local review from the evening Herald-Journal was similarly scathing:

gable and lombard 050176 syracuse herald-journal 00
gable and lombard 050176 syracuse herald-journal 01

In between the publishing of those reviews, the Newspaper Enterprise Association syndicate wrote a feature about how the script of “Gable And Lombard” took liberties with history for the sake of dramatic convenience. Many papers ran it, including the Warsaw Times-Union in Carole’s home state of Indiana on April 10:

gable and lombard 041076 warsaw times-union 00
gable and lombard 041076 warsaw times-union 01
gable and lombard 041076 warsaw times-union 02

That story not only provides insight into the controversy, but to the media’s knowledge of Hollywood’s past:

* Fred MacMurray may have been good friends with Gable, but he also made four films with Lombard — more than any other of her leading men. That isn’t mentioned, proof that in 1976, MacMurray’s career still was viewed through the prism of “My Three Sons” and Walt Disney and, oh yeah, didn’t he play a heel or two for Billy Wilder?
* Mervyn LeRoy directed only one movie with Carole — “Fools For Scandal,” one of her lesser efforts.
* Sandler’s comment, “This is not a documentary. This is a dramatic story with dramatic invention, without being sacrilegious to his memory” (emphasis mine), shows this was a Gable-focused story, understandable. But that doesn’t explain why the script shows Carole as initially a bigger star than Clark, something that never was true.
* Director Sidney Lurie admitted it was dramatic license to show Gable in uniform at the time of Lombard’s death, but added, “But I loved the image of him in uniform, so I cheated for four months.” Uh, Sidney, actually it was seven months, as Clark didn’t join the Army until August.

It was, however, good to see Jean Garceau, who was a personal secretary for both Lombard and Gable, say this cinematic emperor had no clothes (or at least was wearing the wrong ones). As time goes on, her comments increasingly ring true.

Link  Leave a comment

Edit   Tags   Add to memories   Share   Track

Advertisements

Posted September 16, 2013 by vp19 in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: