Fashion and furs from ’34   Leave a comment

Posted by vp19 on 2013.04.24 at 10:50
Current mood: contemplativecontemplative

The recent debate in Slate, the Huffington Post and elsewhere over a 1931 Photoplay article on who possessed the best figure in Hollywood ( is a reminder of how fluid public attitudes and tastes can be. Witness this Paramount portrait of Carole Lombard, p1202-1081, from 1934:

carole lombard p1202-1081a

By ’34 standards, that’s a pretty chic outfit, yet another reason Lombard was considered among the best-dressed stars of her era. Now imagine a current Carole at that age (25 or 26, meaning she would have been born in 1987 or ’88). Can you imagine her, chock full of 2013 sensibilities, wearing fur (assuming her modern self was as much an animal lover as the 1930s Lombard was)? Somehow I can’t, either. Take the fur out of the photo and the portrait is still pretty glamorous, if a bit dated.

This is an original photo, trimmed to 7″ x 9 1/2″. It’s an original and up for bidding, with bids starting at $17.95. The auction closes at 11:57 p.m. (Eastern) on Friday. Think you’re interested? Then visit

Link  Leave a comment

Edit   Tags   Add to memories   Share   Track


Posted April 24, 2013 by vp19 in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: