Posted by vp19 on 2013.04.30 at 00:59
Current mood: nostalgic
Heritage Auctions has two pairs of Carole Lombard photos available, both from Paramount…but one of those pairs doesn’t look as if it came from there. After all, Lombard never made any silents for that studio.
Not convinced those photos, which definitely look to be from the silent era (though it’s difficult to discern whether they’re from Fox, Mack Sennett or even Pathe), were distributed by Paramount? We’ll furnish proof:
Both pictures have a 1937 copyright.
The question then shifts to why did Paramount issue these images? It’s possibly some sort of response to a May 1937 photospread of Lombard and Clark Gable in Look magazine that featured several racy portraits of Carole in the late 1920s (http://carole-and-co.livejournal.com/93954.html), although the pics above are considerably more demure. Beyond that, we’re in the dark — but more than three-quarters of a century later, Lombard fans thank Paramount for making them available.
The other pair of pics are from Carole’s 1933 potboiler, “White Woman.” One of them, from Eugene Robert Richee, is fairly common to collectors:
Not so the other one, featuring her character in a small boat, escaping the steamy Malayan jungle:
The silent era pics are single-weight glossy, in fine+ condition; the “White Woman” images are double-weight and satin finish, in fine/very fine condition. Both pairs are unrestored.
Bidding on each set ends at 11 p.m. (Eastern) on Sunday. Heritage’s bidding process is different than eBay’s, so anyone interested in bidding should become familiar with this firm’s procedure. The Paramount silent set is at http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161318&lotNo=50069; the two from “White Woman” are at http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161318&lotNo=50526.
Posted by vp19 on 2013.04.29 at 08:40
Current mood: artistic
As promised, more Carole Lombard images now available via eBay, beginning with this one, Lombard looking sleek and stylish (albeit with furs), befitting the heiress she portrayed in the 1932 Columbia film “No More Orchids”:
Heritage Movie Posters, which is selling the item, describes it as: “Vintage gelatin silver, single weight, and glossy photo. An unrestored photo with a clean overall appearance. It may have general signs of use, such as slight edge wear, small corner bumps, pinholes, or very minor tears. Light scratches. details. Very Fine-.”
Something else that’s “very fine” is the opening bid price — 99 cents — but for a vintage Lombard pic, you know it won’t last that long. Bids conclude at 10:54 a.m. (Eastern) next Monday, and expect multiple bids for this over the next week. Find out more at http://www.ebay.com/itm/Carole-Lombard-in-No-More-Orchids-Vintage-Movie-Portrait-Photo-Columbia-1932-/190830681749?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2c6e651e95.
Next, Paramount p1202-1164:
That’s Carole on the phone from her dressing room at Paramount in 1935 (with her head beautifully framed among the flowers). According to the seller, this 8″ x 10″ originally ran in Architectural Digest. Bidding begins at $40, with bids closing at 7:10 p.m. (Eastern) Thursday. If this pic catches your interest, visit http://www.ebay.com/itm/PHOTO-OF-CAROLE-LOMBARD-IN-HER-PARAMOUNT-STUDIO-DRESSING-ROOM-/281098581954?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4172c7f7c2 to learn more.
Next up, Lombard with a Paramount artist named Eric Stone, showing off his tribute to her:
The photo also has a Dec. 29, 1931 stamp from the NEA syndicate.
We have no idea whatever happened to the rag portrait of Carole, but this 8″ x 10″ is available, with an opening bid of $100, and bidding slated to end at 7:01 p.m. (Eastern) Thursday. Want this rarity? Go to http://www.ebay.com/itm/RARE-1931-PHOTO-OF-CAROLE-LOMBARD-AND-ERIC-STONE-/281098579969?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4172c7f001.
Finally, a Lombard portrait that in itself isn’t all that uncommon, but the source is interesting:
It’s from NBC radio, specifically its famed (and now gone) Los Angeles headquarters at Sunset and Vine..
…for the short-lived series “The Circle.”
The photo is in near-mint condition, with bids opening at $50 and bids ending at 7:16 p.m. (Eastern) Thursday. You can find out more athttp://www.ebay.com/itm/ORIGINAL-1939-CAROLE-LOMBARD-PHOTO-/281098583697?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4172c7fe91.
Posted by vp19 on 2013.04.28 at 18:24
Current mood: amused
In yesterday’s entry about some new Carole Lombard images, I announced, “We’ll run three of them today and save the other three for tomorrow.” Well, that isn’t going to happen…because we have four more photos for you to enjoy (and bid on, if you so desire).
The first one is above; it’s said to be a George Hurrell photo, but it looks very much like one of the images of Carole used in the 1933 Paramount potboiler “White Woman.” It’s an 8″ x 10″ in near mint condition, including a sealed plastic sleeve. Bids open at $35 and last through 12:19 p.m. (Eastern) Saturday. If interested, go to http://www.ebay.com/itm/CAROLE-LOMBARD-PHOTO-BY-GEORGE-HURRELL/281099455567?_trksid=p2045573.m2042&_trkparms=aid%3D111000%26algo%3DREC.CURRENT%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D27%26meid%3D7289571440613454005%26pid%3D100033%26prg%3D1011%26rk%3D4%26sd%3D370805292435%26.
Next, to April 18, 1936, and one of the first public photos of Lombard with Clark Gable:
From Hearst’s International News Service, this is described as “rare,” probably the reason bids on this start at $100; bids close at 12:46 p.m. Saturday, and you can get more information at http://www.ebay.com/itm/ORIGINAL-1936-PHOTO-OF-CAROLE-LOMBARD-AND-CLARK-GABLE-AT-MIDGET-AUTO-RACES/281099475477?_trksid=p2045573.m2042&_trkparms=aid%3D111000%26algo%3DREC.CURRENT%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D27%26meid%3D7289914780800156376%26pid%3D100033%26prg%3D1011%26rk%3D4%26sd%3D281099455567%26.
Finally, not one, but two images of Lombard with James Stewart in promotional art for “Made For Each Other.” They teamed up for several portraits for the film, but I’ve never seen either of these:
Each of these have opening bids of $7.99, which may mean they aren’t originals, but I can’t say one way or the other. Bidding closes at 1:37 and 1:38 p.m. (Eastern) Thursday. Curious? Then go to http://www.ebay.com/itm/James-Stewart-Carole-Lombard-Publicity-Photo-2/370805291697?_trksid=p2045573.m2042&_trkparms=aid%3D111000%26algo%3DREC.CURRENT%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D27%26meid%3D7290090823319860672%26pid%3D100033%26prg%3D1011%26rk%3D2%26sd%3D370805292435%26 for the picture on top andhttp://www.ebay.com/itm/James-Stewart-Carole-Lombard-Publicity-Photo-3/370805292435?_trksid=p2045573.m2042&_trkparms=aid%3D111000%26algo%3DREC.CURRENT%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D27%26meid%3D7290123000277428714%26pid%3D100033%26prg%3D1011%26rk%3D2%26sd%3D370805291697%26 for the one on the bottom.
We’ll have even more Lombard images tomorrow…but this time, I’m not going to give you a specific number as to how many.
Posted by vp19 on 2013.04.27 at 20:27
Current mood: nostalgic
Posted by vp19 on 2013.04.26 at 00:19
Current mood: pleased
We get letters (or, should we say, email), and one we received today had a request of us. It read:
“I’m wondering…Do you have the header picture of Carole in the sequin and chiffon dress in a bigger size? I’ve never seen it before. Thanks!”
(For those of you who access Carole & Co. via WordPress, an explanation. At our LiveJournal site, we run a header related to Lombard. At the start of 2013, we decided to run a header of every Paramount p1202 portrait of Carole and change it after four days or so; since our collection features several hundred such portraits, it should take several years before we exhaust them all. They aren’t visible at WordPress.)
Currently, we’re at p1202-69, and for consistency’s sake, we run them at the same depth. But the good news is that we do have a larger version of that portrait…and here it is:
Hope that’s large enough for you.
Posted by vp19 on 2013.04.25 at 09:10
Current mood: accomplished
Even when Carole Lombard wasn’t in the best of moods, as she clearly isn’t in this image from May 1938, she generally was cooperative where signing autographs was concerned. It went with the territory of being a celebrity, and it probably remained a thrill to Carole that someone would actually want her signature for the signature’s sake, not for endorsing a check or paying a bill.
We bring this up because Lombard is among an array of notables who can be found in an autograph book being auctioned at eBay:
She’s in pretty good company, too, as other signees include one of her co-stars, acting and music legends, and the man who probably was the number-one hero of the 1920s. But let’s start with Lombard’s signature:
Looks authentic to me. Alas, we have no idea when and where she signed it; perhaps Carole Sampeck of The Lombard Archive can do some tea-leaf reading for clues (at least as to when).
Now to that hero I mentioned, someone whose autograph the Lombard of the late 1920s would have desired:
Yep, that’s Charles Lindbergh, the aviation pioneer whose solo transatlantic flight in May 1927 brought him worldwide acclaim. The owner of the book, whose father was a naval rear admiral, attended Lindy’s take-off from Floyd Bennett Field in New York. (Note: My late father, about 3 1/2 at the time, was taken by my grandfather, a Brooklyn newspaperman, to Floyd Bennett the day before, but inclement weather pushed back the take-off.)
The co-star? None other than Gary Cooper:
Another leading man who signed was Franchot Tone:
Cornelia Otis Skinner was a respected author and actress:
Carole may have caught this star in concert — the king of heigh-de-ho, Cab Calloway:
And operatic singer-actress Gladys Swarthout signed this in conjunction with a performance she gave in Providence, R.I.:
Among others who signed: Nelson Eddy and Jeanette MacDonald and bandleader Don Redman.
Lombard autographs don’t come cheaply, especially among this kind of company. As of this writing, 10 bids have been made, topping out at $330, and bidding closes at 10:29 p.m. (Eastern) on Monday. Think you would like to own this? Learn more at http://www.ebay.com/itm/AMAZING-Autograph-Book-Charles-Lindbergh-Cab-Calloway-Carole-Lombard-NR-ORIG/390583302344?_trksid=p2045573.m2042&_trkparms=aid%3D111000%26algo%3DREC.CURRENT%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D27%26meid%3D7211300616256921134%26pid%3D100033%26prg%3D1011%26rk%3D1%26sd%3D390583302344%26.
Posted by vp19 on 2013.04.24 at 10:50
Current mood: contemplative
The recent debate in Slate
, the Huffington Post
and elsewhere over a 1931 Photoplay
article on who possessed the best figure in Hollywood (http://carole-and-co.livejournal.com/595236.html
) is a reminder of how fluid public attitudes and tastes can be. Witness this Paramount portrait of Carole Lombard, p1202-1081, from 1934:
By ’34 standards, that’s a pretty chic outfit, yet another reason Lombard was considered among the best-dressed stars of her era. Now imagine a current Carole at that age (25 or 26, meaning she would have been born in 1987 or ’88). Can you imagine her, chock full of 2013 sensibilities, wearing fur (assuming her modern self was as much an animal lover as the 1930s Lombard was)? Somehow I can’t, either. Take the fur out of the photo and the portrait is still pretty glamorous, if a bit dated.
This is an original photo, trimmed to 7″ x 9 1/2″. It’s an original and up for bidding, with bids starting at $17.95. The auction closes at 11:57 p.m. (Eastern) on Friday. Think you’re interested? Then visit http://www.ebay.com/itm/CAROLE-LOMBARD-Orig-1934-Fashion-Photo-Hat-and-Furs-/380628904732?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item589f402b1c.